I used to say, when I
cooperated with the National School of Civil Protection in the International
Coordination Course, as a media expert, that I love emergency drills because
whatever happens no one would be hurt. I am not sure anymore of this statement.
Let’s make myself clear, I still love drills because, generally speaking, it is
still true the former statement, but what may happen when we run a drill though
social media and it is not clear the difference between fiction and reality?
To avoid this
happening, I’d like to point out some general outlines based on a wonderful
drill performed beautifully by the city of San Francisco, in the USA. As you
all know, they practiced the response and recovery to a simulated magnitude 7.8
earthquake during the 2013 GoldenGuardian
exercise last May 15th. They
counted on Twitter accounts @SF_emergency, @EM4SF. The first of them has nearly
60,000 followers and is used for sending out both urgent and non-urgent messages.
San Francisco Heroes |
Besides expressing my
congratulations, I wish to explain what they did so well as an example of best
practices.
Advise the media.
To me this point is crucial. Sometimes people tend to
forget that the “old” media are not only the way many people get the news but,
moreover, they are a key point because they infom the community and also reproduce what it is being
delivered through social media. If they ignore that an exercise is going on it
is possible that they believed, as the rest of citizens, that the messages
shared in an official account are real, especially if authorities, first responders
and relevant stakeholder don’t use any especial #hashtag for the event.
A different topic is whether it is preferable to use
the official account, as San Francisco did so well, or to create a specific
profile for the exercise. Personally, I like the second idea because if we create an
account with the word “drill “or “exercise” in the profile people would know what is going on,
as @LuisSerranoR, Madrid 112 PIOs prefers, though it is also true that in
this case people need to identify the acccount. Pros and cons to be evaluating
depending on the circumstances, aim of the drill, etcetera. I use it myself
when teaching social media and the idea is just getting the students familiar
with social media.
Use all channels
As the Public Information Officer for the San
Francisco Department of Emergency Management, Francis Zamora said “It’s great
that we can push messages out to different people, but not everybody’s on
social media and so we use [more traditional] tools to do that.”
Great! That’s the idea. Use all channels. Social media
is one more tool in the toolbox. No need to insist on this.
Involve (and informe) all
relevant stakeholders
Pretty obvious, but still, well done. If in a real
emergency all relevant stakeholders participate it is a good idea to involve
them to be prepared before it happens. So, the appropriate integration of all
relevant stakeholders, the better.
Update social media
It is necessary to update information as it changes within
the exercise but also not to forget the rest. If we didn’t create a different
account there should be a way to ensure that information related to the
exercise is classified as belonging to it, so citizens know that all the rest
is real information. Any one reading the timeline should be able to get updated
information and must have a certain idea of what is reality and what is not.
It is also quite useful to make a summary of the event and analyze what went wrong and right to improve the response of the emergency services.
Inform when the exercise is over
As simple as this. We say when the exercise begins and
when it is over. Still the same. We know what we are up to and that is always
good. The more certainties we have, the better.
Any more ideas?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario